There were no warnings, there was nothing to prompt the locking, since everything was within line and respectful of everyone on the site.

I'm not sure if he requested the lock; I just know he saw the thread.Drewsov wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. He saw a thread that was calling him out on lying in a public forum.
That's gotta be painful.
What would have probably been better is if he had had the guts to come and apologize, instead of requesting a lock on a site that he doesn't even use anymore.
questioning of his faith and allBruce_Campbell wrote:Yeah... I don't really think it deserved to be locked. Most of the "ripping" was brought on by the guy's own actions. And many would call those actions a bit less than honest.
Let's not forget all the ripping this particular member did on Drew that went mostly unchecked.
It wasn't just that.ChickenSoup wrote:questioning of his faith and allBruce_Campbell wrote:Yeah... I don't really think it deserved to be locked. Most of the "ripping" was brought on by the guy's own actions. And many would call those actions a bit less than honest.
Let's not forget all the ripping this particular member did on Drew that went mostly unchecked.