1) This is a Christian site, respect our beliefs and we will respect yours.
2) This is a family friendly site, no swearing or posting offensive links, pictures, or signatures.
3) Please be respectful of others.
4) Trolls are not welcome and will be dealt with accordingly.
5) No racial comments, jokes or images
6) If you see a dead thread over 6 months old, let it rest in peace
7) No Duplicate posts
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3494
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
By that do you mean spell components? Yes, but it's simplified (sort of).ccgr wrote:Jay and I are cool with it, he wants to know if reagents are still needed.
In 2e, each spell that had a material component to cast would list what it needed, and a strict DM could insist that the player actually go through the effort of having his character acquire the needed materials. Most DMs ignored this except in the case of exceptional items. (Like the 1,000 GP diamond needed to cast Resurrection.) So it was more complex, but most people didn't bother.
In 5e, spells also list the specific items but if a character is equipped with a component pouch it's assumed those items are already available. Alternatively, a spellcaster can use an Arcane Focus (like a staff, magic wand, etc.) in place of normal spell components.
Only items with a listed GP value need to be paid specific attention to.
"Don't take refuge in the false security of consensus."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests