Deepfreeze32 wrote:... However, the way the theme is explored is through massive conversations between characters, which essentially boils down to me puzzling out the issue for myself. I include some scenes that imply the state of things (A character accesses a Senator's security system with little effort), but I can't shake the feeling that my story is a not so much a story and more like my characters are grandstanding and filibustering. But at the same time...I wanted to make a dialog-heavy story. These topics lend themselves to conversations in the real world, why not a fictional one?
I don't see anything wrong with a dialogue-heavy story. In fact, one could argue that writing from a first-person perspective is nothing but a dialogue-driven story. Just that most of the dialogue is internal to the protagonist.
Deepfreeze32 wrote:I worry that instead of writing a good story with interesting themes, I'm writing a boring one filled with long, tedious discussions about topics. At the same time, this is part of what I wanted to make: A politically-relevant story that can be enjoyed by those wishing to see it for what it is, and for those who wish to see it as a critique of US Intelligence Practices.
It depends on your audience. Some will like analytical, fictional debates, while others will prefer short, chopped sentences which don't get in the way of stuff blowing up. It can be hard to balance the two, and few authors could do it well (e.g. Tom Clancy). But it'll just take practice, editing, getting feedback from your readers, and editing some more. You'll get there.
Deepfreeze32 wrote:The real problem is that I am far and away my own worst critic. I hate nearly everything I do, as it's not perfect, or even close. Even if it's better than some of my friends who do the same things, I still don't feel adequate.
You know what? You always will be your harshest critic. Since it's your creation, you'll be the first - and possibly the only - person to notice the little flaws and inconsistencies. But that's OK.
Do you read the pep talks that come from NaNoWriMo? They can be useful and inspirational, too. I remember one from a few years ago - I think it was Alan Dean Foster, but I don't remember. Anyway, he had gotten to one point where he was frustrated, so he called up his agent. "I can't do this any more. I hate my characters, I hate my setting, the plot is stupid... I don't think I can finish this novel."
"Good," said the agent. "That means you're on the edge of a breakthrough, and you're almost done!"
Turns out that the author went through this same kind of despair
every single time. For as long as the author and the agent had been working together, the author would despair about his work sometime during the process. The agent had grown to recognize this as part of the author's routine, and knew that it was a sign they had another best-seller on their hands.
So if you're worrying about how the book is going, and that you don't think anyone will like it, just keep writing, anyway. You won't know for sure until it gets into the hands of your audience.
Oh, this is the thread for questions, isn't it? Here's a question - do you feel better now?
