ChickenSoup wrote:what was so horrible? O_o
Everything except the amazing set pieces and imagery. Which were awesome.
ChickenSoup wrote:what was so horrible? O_o








Deepfreeze32 wrote:Or, maybe, (I'm one of those Silmarillion types too) he's realized that artistic license isn't a bad thing at all. Look at the Lord of the Rings movies. They aren't exactly like the book, but you tell me how you would fit what would easily be 15+ hours of filmable material into a movie that would actually be view-able by the normal person, and then we can talk.
Wow. Run-on sentence. Anyway, I think it's obvious that the reason Frodo shows up is because the movie is a frame story. You may say "But that's not how the book was!" The core story is still there, wrapped around an external narrative. If you have a problem with frame stories in adaptations, please destroy your copy of The Princess Bride movie at once.In all seriousness, it's just a story-telling device.
So forgive us if it seems silly of you to spew movie hate like this.


TripExistence wrote:To be fair, the original Princess Bride book is like a frame story within a frame story.![]()












ArcticFox wrote:Am I the only one who saw the LOTR trilogy before I read it?
(Yes, I did read it later...)


ArcticFox wrote:Am I the only one who saw the LOTR trilogy before I read it?
(Yes, I did read it later...)

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests